The Equipment Excuse

Though there are websites, magazines and endless forums dedicated to arguing about which camera is better, there is one thing that I truly believe:

When it comes to making a great image, the equipment actually matters very little. No, really. The camera is just a tool.

The composition of the image is what's key. The camera's ability to capture it in the sharpest manner using the highest number of megapixels is useless if it's a garbage composition.

The ability to create a great image is in the mind of the photographer - not the abilities of the camera. The camera is simply a tool. A good analogy here would be to consider this: Eric Clapton plays a guitar (a Fender Stratocaster, usually) worth thousands of dollars. If a random person is handed this guitar they won't automatically sound like Eric Clapton. However, if you gave Eric Clapton a cheapie guitar, chances are, he'd still sound like Eric Clapton. There is no difference with cameras and photographers. Also, just like guitars, an older camera with a little distortion is often a good thing (just ask a Holga photographer)!

So, why do uber-expensive cameras exist - and why do the pro's use them? They are much more durable than consumer-grade cameras and they are often faster to use. The image quality, especially in this latest generation of cameras, is often the same. Professionals use their equipment constantly and it takes a beating. Consumers do not and consequently can do without the ruggedness, saving a bit of money in the process.

The point is, get out and shoot what you have. Don't make excuses for what you are shooting - find a way to creatively work around your limitations.

Oh, and try not to wince every time you make a great image and a viewers' first response is "wow, you have a great camera!" Truth is, you have a great imagination. The camera is just a tool.

Ken Rockwell has a treatise on the above subject as well... here.